Monday, March 19, 2018

Comparison

Last semester in World Since, we read the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich,
which dealt with similar themes as Slaughterhouse Five. After reading Slaughterhouse Five, I
noticed a difference in how each book dealt with the concept of dignity.

Here’s a basic summary of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich: It follows a rather eventful
day for a man named Ivan Denisovich Shukhov at a Soviet imposed labor camp. Ivan is
Russian himself, but was accused of being a spy due to him being captured by the Germans.
For efficiency, the prisoners were split into squads, and Ivan was a respected member of Gang
104.

Slaughterhouse Five portrays the ease in which dignity can be taken away. In general, the
American soldiers lack dignity through their largely immoral ways and poor health
conditions. A cook at the prison even claims, “All the real soldiers are dead.” Analyzing
specific characters delves deeper into this theme. Roland Weary grew up with people
constantly “ditching” him, and was, and is, a revenge-seeking bully. As a soldier, he is just as
pathetic as Billy, but his strong patriotic values created his own dreams of grandeur. After
becoming ill from walking in the wooden clogs, he tells another soldier that it was Billy’s
fault and to seek revenge on him. Weary lacks dignity on every level, and his upbringing most
likely took it away from him. Billy also lacks dignity, but in a different manner. From the
start of his time in the war, in situations where he was saved, he didn't even want to be saved.
His urgency for survival was not really present. Vonnegut has a complex take on dignity, and
Billy’s lack of dignity is an example of this take. Billy never wanted to fight in the war in the
first place; he was drafted. Vonnegut uses his characters’ interactions, especially inter-
country, to show that war causes a loss of dignity.


With One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, it is very clear that keeping dignity in tact is
important to the respectable characters. Survival is the number one goal for the prisoners, and Ivan
only uses moral and honorable means to make sure he survives. He is resourceful, which ends up
being his greatest tool. Moral compromises are acceptable to a certain degree due to the
circumstances the prisoners are in, as Ivan sometimes uses his position to bully and swindle people.
He wants to become the “ideal prisoner” or make the best out of his situation. Characters whose
actions aren’t dignified are looked down upon by the other prisoners. One of Gang 104’s members,
Fetiukov, literally scrounges for food scraps and tobacco and is not respected by Ivan in particular.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Splendid post! I agree with what you said about Vonnegut's commentary on the concept of dignity throughout Slaughterhouse Five. The whole book paints war in a very unconventionally negative light, and Vonnegut definitely seems to be suggesting that, in contrast to what the traditional narrative says, war is filled with undignified, unrespectable soldiers. Also, the way you contrasted this commentary with that of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, which presents the traditional narrative of war and dignity is really interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post! It's definitely interesting to consider Kurt Vonnegut's depiction of the soldiers as without dignity. None of the soldiers, other than maybe that one dude, seems to be very involved in the war or to take it very seriously. When I picture someone with dignity, I picture a person with their head held high despite their circumstances, and the soldiers in Slaughterhouse Five would definitely not fit that bill.

    ReplyDelete